Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (214480)	10/12/2021 12:35:18 PM
From: combjelly	3 Recommendations Recommended By bentway CentralParkRanger Terry Maloney Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 365548

I did see some mention of Zuck's money, but it never got much traction. I suspect that those in power didn't want to explain why heavily Democratic districts are routinely starved of money and resources while Republican districts have what they need.

To: Lane3 who wrote (214480)	10/12/2021 12:54:04 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 365548

>> I've been watching carefully since you made illegitimacy of Z's funding your main argument for the "steal" but I haven't seen that charge from anyone else. The Z money made it corrupt. You cannot have a private individual putting as much money into the election as the federal government did, directed at manipulating vote totals, without a corrupting influence. Wouldn't matter who it was, whether it was the Koch Brothers or Zuckerberg or who. If that isn't apparent to you, you're not trying very hard. I will say the reason you don't hear anyone talking about it is you are choosing not to listen. You listen only to leftist media, but others are talking. You're not going to find Chuck Todd or George Steph in here. But there is plenty of awareness that it was stolen, and they present different perspectives that if you were in fact an honest broker you would have no problem comprehending. But the truth is you're a Democrat now and forever, which equips you with certain characteristics that will not allow you to be objective. I get it. The 2020 Election Wasn't Stolen, It Was Bought By Mark Zuckerberg (thefederalist.com) Wisconsin election probe targeting illegally changed laws, Zuckerbucks \| Daily Angle \| dailyangle.com (Here's one from a year ago with a nonsense spin, but still worth reading): How Mark Zuckerberg's Millions Made Election 2020 Go Smoothly : NPR The Zuckerbergs’ largesse is an unprecedented private expenditure on a process long held to be an exclusively public operation and has spurred at least nine lawsuits challenging the effort by the Center for Tech and Civil Life: Zuckerberg paying for election operations, vote counting across U.S. - Washington Times (READ) How Zuckerberg money funded election officials in 2020 vote The 2020 Election Wasn’t Stolen, It Was Bought By Mark Zuckerberg