SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (214537)10/12/2021 3:48:40 PM
From: Lane33 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
CentralParkRanger
combjelly

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 365740
 
I don't see how that is relevant.

It's not broadly relevant. What's relevant about it to me, as I said, is seeing just how little discomfort you have out on the fringe. When you're all exercised over something that not even on your fellow alternate-universe fringe dwellers' radar, that's fringe of the fringe of the fringe. It's sad.


If a person cannot look at a corrupt situation and say, "That is bad" without confirmation from DC politicians, that's a pretty big blind spot.


I don't need confirmation to make my calls on corruption. I do need evidence. I've already written you dozens of posts on this alleged corruption. I have said that elections should be fully funded by their states so that private donations would not be suggested. I evaluated all the material you provided and have not seen indication of corruption in this case beyond it being unusual, thus raising one's antennae. Even one on the links you offered said that it wasn't illegal on its face and there's no evidence of any particular occurrences of hanky panky. When you see smoke, you automatically yell fire. Your perception of smoke let alone fire is entirely partisan.


If Trump were engaged in any corrupt activity I'd say it.


We'll never know. If you can't see it, you can't call it. And you definitely can't see it.