Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LB11 who wrote (5013)	2/5/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: Larry Sullivan	Respond to of 74651

LB11 - You said "Correct me if Im Wrong" You are wrong. You are mixing up all kinds of stuff. Please read techstocks.com; Larry...

To: LB11 who wrote (5013)	2/5/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: Ibexx	Respond to of 74651

Where is our friend Paul F? He ought to be interested in this news item, being a long-term NOVL fan....not much longer, I am afraid. Ibexx

To: LB11 who wrote (5013)	2/5/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: Alan Buckley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74651

[Correct me if Im Wrong, MSFT was forcing Computer manufacturers to put IE on the desktop and the machine. If they didn't do this or wanted to put Netscape on they were threatening them with discontinuing their Windows license] No, you're wrong about MSFT prohibiting the addition of Netscape. They let the computer makers ADD whatever they want, including Netscape. They just can't SUBTRACT and still sell it as Windows. To understand why, look at all the confusion in the Unix market. There are many different "flavors" of Unix, and this fragmentation is a big disincentive to developers because they have to sell a modified version of their code for each flavor, a tremendous burden. MSFT wants there to be a clear least common denominator that all Windows developers can count on. This is perfectly sensible.