Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David R who wrote (40657)	2/5/1998 9:45:00 PM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

David, Academics are the feces of the world! Imagine, being able to rationalize the 'murder' of a 1-week old infant, infantcide!...but, hey, thats what academics do! Myself, having to had to perform endless autopsies on still-borns and surgical exams on spontaneous & induced abortions, my feelings are this......the term is 'products of conception', the pathologists job is to obtain villi & or fetal parts ( if present )at the surgical exam to document 'life'....w/o villi, placental tissues, maternal cotyledons, fetal sac, etc....what you're left with is blood clot and hemmorhagic tissues............seeing this day in & day out in clinical situations and making note of the socio-economic make-up of the patient (induced abortion), my feelings are that govt has no right to interfere with a womans' choice, on a philosophical plane, 'products of conception' are not a viable 'entity'...secondly, giving govt. the ability to make that choice leaves us powerless when/if govt. decides to make abortions mandatory. Democracy implies 'choice', but what the MIT professor suggests is 'murder'. Pugs