SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ggersh who wrote (179715)10/29/2021 9:01:32 PM
From: TobagoJack3 Recommendations

Recommended By
ggersh
marcher
Maurice Winn

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 220063
 
With the Foundation series, again and again, per Asimov pointed out, 'decay at the edges'.

I believe Russia and China are done with any seriously responses to any and everything USA has to say, because whomever saying whatever has neither anything new to say nor any staying power to deal. Nothing more to do except to make preparations for possible eventualities.

EU big states France and Germany, as opposed to the lapdogs Lithuania and such, are likely of one like-mind, looking out for respective #1s. Unclear to me how important other state actors can possibly be in rest of planet.

In the "Romance of the Kingdoms" en.wikipedia.org , the one of few Chinese classics, for all growing up in China, ate it for breakfast, lunch, snack and dinner since first aware, say age 4.

We are entering a very interesting period of history, and coincidentally (not), 2026 - 2032 coming into view, one or another way. I can go on and on with the proto-analysis but too early still. 2025 good time to delve in.

In the meantime, good news, that there are good folks willing to tell it like it is ...

signal.org

and the signal is strong.



To: ggersh who wrote (179715)10/30/2021 1:15:48 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 220063
 
curiouser and curiouser, and am wondering what the obsolesce of an entire navy might do to budgets

we here on the thread suspected or knew, at least aware that ...

circa 2016 Message 30757295 for environmental protection
no, i do not believe there would be major war in the south china sea, and soon, for the rest of the pacific ocean, such be unsung benefits of levelling the playing field, anti-access / area denial, peaceful rise protocol

circa 2016 the 'Underwater Great Wall' Message 30901323
NO one seems to notice, but China now has built, not one but five new “Great Walls”.

circa 2019 Message 31970276
imagine self to be captain of submarine or surface war ship, inching towards the death zone, all marked by grids for better targeting, carrying only so much munition, and two never able to get within range, tagged by autonomous machines silently gliding

all quite sometimes ago, and now, clinical trials might be underway

Observation, that should the take-out of 3 billion dollars submarine be as simple as tee-ing $15K drones, AUKUS shall need a few more subs than currently planned 8

scmp.com

South China Sea: experts still in dark over what smashed into US submarine

USS Connecticut photographed moored in Guam with part of its nose removed, suggesting head-on collision with object, experts say

The submarine’s location the day after the incident means it could have suffered the damage near the Paracel Islands, they say


It’s almost certain that the USS Connecticut was hit in a head-on collision that cracked its sonar dome, the most important sensor system, meaning the sub became effectively blind and deaf underwater and had to escape immediately,” Macau-based military observer Antony Wong Tong said.

Twelve days earlier, Beijing-based maritime think tank the South China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative posted a low-resolution satellite image on Twitter and said a suspected Seawolf-class submarine had been spotted sailing 43 nautical miles (80km) southeast of Paracel Island on October 3, the day after the apparent collision.



South China Sea: the dispute that could start a military conflict

11 Aug 2020


Wong said that information suggested a collision could have happened close to the exclusive economic zone claimed by China around the disputed islands, even if the US did not recognise such a zone when conducting freedom of navigation operations in what it says are international waters.

“The collision may have happened less than 43 nautical miles from the Paracels, and a sub operation is much more sensitive than those of surface vessels, pushing the US Navy to keep a low profile and avoid alerting their Chinese counterpart,” Wong said.

“The fact that the American sub could stay under water for so long suggests the damage was not serious.”



The USS Connecticut (seen here in 2018) was seen 43 nautical miles from Paracel Island the day after its apparent collision. Photo: US Navy

The South China Sea is the world’s busiest waterway for military and commercial vessels. Beijing is building a massive underwater observation network, dubbed the “underwater Great Wall”, for maritime science and national security applications.

Beijing-based naval expert Li Jie said the Chinese navy may have been aware of the American sub’s route through the region but did not establish where the incident occurred and just let it pass. The damage could have been caused by something the size of an underwater drone, rather than another submarine, Li said.

The US Navy’s announcement of the accident days later did not give further details such as the extent of the damage, what the sub had collided with or the specific location.

Its report on October 10 said the USS Connecticut had collided with an unknown object in the South China Sea, injuring 11 sailors on board. The submarine’s nuclear propulsion system was not affected and it was able to return to the Guam base for checks, it said. No updates have been given since.

“This accident reminded the People’s Liberation Army Navy to further beef up China’s underwater surveillance capability, as well as its defensive strength in the region,” Li said.