Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (180056)	11/7/2021 1:34:11 AM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 219648

<<e-RMB>> My very limited understanding of the e-RMB is that (i) it is not blockchain based, and (ii) it works off-line. I wait to see how that works. I am guessing that that it would be relatively easy for CCP China China China to wrestle back BTC # production based on plentiful solar electricity from all latitudes of Xinjiang to Yunnan, and from Heilongjiang to Tibet, and from Pracels to Hainan starting from 2023, but must wait for the BTC to be seamlessly stitched to the monetary DNA and fully expressed in all manners of ETFs and matters of Defi, in USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and best of all, in UK. It would then be handy, to rejoin the BTC club and do global common prosperity, per rule by being able to, whenever necessary, to make rules. In such a construct, BTC can go much extremely higher, and should bad actors continue to bad act, its monetary system sent to zero in a flash, to shock & awe as many eyes as it might take to turn common prosperity to common sense. It seems to me that should any domain hook an officially sanctioned global-common currency however decentralised, freely traded on at least one global exchange under sovereign nuclear shield, and back such by gold at least explicitly in a theoretical sense, and make sure able to rally 51%-BTC-governance at will, such a schema might just suck in all kinds of global capital as a metaverse black hole might swallow up all touches its event horizon. BTC popularisation goes hand in glove with US$ de-popularisation, without need for any sovereign power to explicitly tee up competing global reserve currency. Only need to support BTC # mining by using limitless solar electricity with inputs from Xinjiang and stuff from Shenzhen, and everything traded in Greater Bay Area Freedom Island HK. Very exciting prospect, and certainly would be for the greater good, as bad actors would then be less able to afford wars, drones, and busybody sea lane disruptions as all at risk of being sent to zero without use of any kinetics. Stephanie is too conservative, or too polite, that in nutshell, the bipartisan inclination to dilute the Dollar against BTC / gold is unwise. But if so, we buy BTC and / or gold, in preparation for debt jubilee celebration as end-gaming ends.