Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Logain Ablar who wrote (180188)	11/10/2021 3:20:54 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218179

Been following the (the story of) California’s lead w/r to the $1K threshold Do not know whether the $1K threshold is per commissioning of the non-prosecutable crime, or by per shop per day Generally am skeptical of the approach, but remain agnostic, and only because am not convinced that prosecuting such crimes would net net decrease what might well be systemic. Herding thousands into prison to learn the better tricks of the trade might result in net net worse Fining thousands so that they need to commit more and bigger crimes might end up in net net worst Dunno, and I am not being sarcastic Crime is a symptom, and criminals are victims also, if we are to be understanding Locked up criminals cost net net money, if we are practical Can recommend re-education centers, but I understand why such an approach might attract criticism So, here we are, until we move