Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sunabeach who wrote (43815)	11/18/2021 2:16:02 PM
From: ajtj99	1 Recommendation Recommended By roto Respond to of 97558

Theoretically, there is a limit. There are only so many trees <G>

To: sunabeach who wrote (43815)	11/18/2021 2:20:11 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97558

This is like asking is it better to have a ton of food and die of heart disease and diabetes, or be in a cycle of feast or famine but mostly starving. The right answer is that it is better to have unlimited food but have self-restraint and not overindulge yourself. Message 33580067 The problem you are complaining about is one of political will, not a problem of the means. It's better to have lots of food but to eat modestly and exercise often, than to have to be out walking for food dawn to dusk.