Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J R KARY who wrote (8249)	2/6/1998 10:46:00 AM
From: Doug Smith	Respond to of 213177

I think that the change of dates is more about an internal struggle in the LOOP. With the changes with Claris, newton group including e-mates and with the adjustments to product line, I think that it is safe to assume that the shift in dates is more about getting ducks in a row than relationships with Pixar or the CEO question. I think that the G3 sales figures for Q1 were a shock to aapl. They wanted high levels, but did not expect it all to go as well as it did. It is just not normal for aapl to have so few problems with new product rollouts. OS8, was the same way. In the meantime, there is new energy at aapl and there must be a bit more time to insure that announcements continue to generate an upswing in confidence and support. I don't think Pixar had anything to do with the internal aapl details.

To: J R KARY who wrote (8249)	2/6/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Yiota	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213177

Hi J R KARY, I have noticed some heavy buying accumulation in Apples stock recently, something big is pending (just my feeling). I am still long and bullish 2,700 @ 18.75 , I have been following the thread all of you are doing a wonderful job analyzing APPLE, keep up the good work your all helping a lot of people. regards, Giota

To: J R KARY who wrote (8249)	2/6/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: HerbVic	Respond to of 213177

Just my opinion, but I think we can take Steve Jobs position on the CEO question at face value. i.e. "He doesn't want it." I can't remember how long, but it took him some time to find John Skully. He will be even more cautious this time. And I can't get that image of him kicking sand in Hawaii musing over his options on the matter out of my perception on it. Nice slow climb over the last few days. Is it time for the shorts to find the door? Those ads have to increase the quicksand factor on short positions. Will there be a run to the other end of the seesaw? This stock is cheap, cheap, cheap compared to the rest of the computer industry stocks. I'm just a rookie wearing rose colored glasses. Is my prognosis too early? Good hunting, HerbVic