Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A Real American President: Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sr K who wrote (321695)	12/9/2021 12:42:37 AM
From: Sr K	1 Recommendation Recommended By Honey_Bee Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 457259

If the Supreme Court rules it's illegal except by state Individual law passed by a majority of the voters on the current voter roll, as of the most recent federal Election Day, then individual states (California) could allow it as the SC defines it, but it might be illegal in 36-38 of the states. It would not be a free for-all as California bids to pay with regular tax revenue. If they follow Newsome's suggestion, then he's asking for the SC to define what applies for he 50 states, and territories. I think what Newsome proposes, to force it onto the other up to 49 will backfire.