Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BAAT - world records for electric vehicles with zinc-air -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shashyazhi who wrote (917)	2/6/1998 3:14:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6464

All long shareholders should call every stock that they own in their cash accounts (Type 1) into NAME certificate form. This is because of the following reasons. -- Complaints to regulatory agencies haven't stopped the practice of undeclared short selling. However, one way companies can protect themselves is to recommend to shareholders that they take physical delivery of their stock certificates. When physical delivery of stock certificates is demanded by a significant number of shareholders, the creators of nonexistent stock can be squeezed. The short sellers won't have stock certificates to deliver and thus they will cause losses for them and will cause them to move their undeclared short activities elsewhere. -------- The present special situation may have to do with the above comments and has nothing to do with Type 1 or Type 2 (cash/margin) accounts. We are not talking about legal shorting we are talking about blatant selling on nonexistent shares to flood the market. Thus keeping the price of a stock down and to terminal short it at the same time. If a terminal short is made (stock value = $0) then the shorts or market makers never have to worry about coving their shorts or extra shares that they flooded the market with. This is why every shareholder must demand delivery of their certificates! Riley G

To: shashyazhi who wrote (917)	2/6/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: Jeannie Dixon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6464

The thrill of Baat. Thanks to Jodi, Stephanie and TokyoMex for all the interest. Good team work and great promotion!!! I've never seen a day like Thursday's fireworks. Compare this Company to Ballard Power, Baat has got a long ,long, long, long way to go.Like Toykomex said Pump and Dump. Another inside OTC, MM Dream come true!!!!!! Good luck to all you 60 million share holders....Maybe you will become BATT POWER OR BAAT PLOWER