SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (181410)12/15/2021 6:12:56 AM
From: THE ANT1 Recommendation

Recommended By
maceng2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217857
 
My guess is we have seen 20% of the potential bad side effects of the mRNA vaccine and 30% are out there but hidden and 50% will show up only long term. My guess is tens of thousands of cases of heart failure that show up in old age. I am not anti vaccine in those over 50 or with other illness. I still would not take an mRNA vaccine. I prefer the Sputnik and Chinese vaccines. J and J OK for non young women and Novartis looks interesting but not available



To: maceng2 who wrote (181410)12/15/2021 7:06:00 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217857
 
I am not claiming anything about ivermectin other then it is banned in the U.S.

I have looked for the reasons why. Medical establishment claims fraud /flawed studies.

I do not believe any statistics from Brazil and South Africa, India, etc

How many people in U.S. die from ivermectin. Not many.

Who will change no ivermectin policy?

Can anyone make money on iver?

FDA will require clinical trials first.



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News