Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: arun gera who wrote (181632)	12/18/2021 9:46:35 AM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 218019

<<The stat fiddlers keep bringing me back to life>> Well, once they don't let the the Insurance companies know, you can keep the "3 times every year" Life Insurance pay outs, and whose to worry? As any insurance swindle criminal will tell you, it will be just an extra half cent on the dollar on the Insurance rate. Likewise the $39 billion that Pfizer made on the "vaccine" did not have any marketing to pay for, or development costs. Nearly all that money went straight to the bottom line. How kool is that ? As normally those costs are at least 60%. The chairman of Reuters is on the Pfizer board, and I expect he assured the panel that he could take care of any concerns or misunderstandings of the common pubic taxpayer. Butt the money gets to be paid out anyway, why should the public be concerned? Got yer card? I carry mine all the time. I'm thinking of having it tattooed on my forehead. Opps, that was supposed to be a joke, some dumb idiot might think it's a good idea though. -g-