Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DinoNavarre who wrote (754202)	12/21/2021 11:15:27 AM
From: ig	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793965

My primary care physician told that my 2.72 score was the highest he had seen, I believe he told me that 2.27 was the highest he had seen before my result.....Hope my high score is a good thing...??? I'm guessing it means your body mounted a pretty good defense against the bug. That's a good thing, but I don't think it means those antibodies are currently protecting you at a high level. From what I've read, a high level of Covid antibodies will protect you for several months, but have not been shown to protect you indefinitely. So, your score is a Good Thing in the sense that your body does a good job of developing Covid antibodies in response to infection, but not necessarily a Good Thing if you think you've now got some kind of walking-around, permanent natural immunity. Hoping that my near zero sugar ingestion policy (no matter what name sugar shows up as), will help me ward off cancers as I get older.... That sounds great to me. An essential discipline for long-term health, IMO. Anyone who wants to know more about the harm caused by sugar can start by looking up Robert Lustig.