Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: research1234 who wrote (165168)	12/21/2021 9:05:04 AM
From: codfish23	7 Recommendations Recommended By da_cheif™ GROUND ZERO™ Hugh Bett isopatch kapex and 2 more members Respond to of 207804

So, it's a therapeutic of the prophylaxis type. Until 2020, that was not what "vaccines" were intended to do. Taking your vitamin D, Zinc, probably accomplishes more in preventing severe disease, but I've never heard ONE govt official recommend these. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine probably do more, with much less risk. Even natural remedies like black cumin seeds probably do more, but the black cumin seed lobby does not have the billion$ required to ndo a double blind study. It's Not about your health.........

To: research1234 who wrote (165168)	12/21/2021 9:07:17 AM
From: heraclitus	Respond to of 207804

Are there ANY chances of adverse reactions due to the vax? If so, are they presented to the recipient prior to receiving the vax? I have seen many ads on TV extolling the benefits of the vax but I have not heard one listing of potential adverse effects as done with every other medication being advertised. Why is this? You say "it was never guaranteed to stop the virus completely". Are there any guarantees? Can I at least sue the manufacturer if I do have adverse effects? If not, why? Pure Bloods want to know.

To: research1234 who wrote (165168)	12/21/2021 9:28:01 AM
From: the traveler	1 Recommendation Recommended By Winfastorlose Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 207804

I have seen a lot of propaganda about the great benefits of being jabbed if you get covid. However, I have seen no credible empirical evidence to suggest that a jabbed victim is in for a milder case than the unjabbed?

To: research1234 who wrote (165168)	12/21/2021 11:32:49 AM
From: samwarner	3 Recommendations Recommended By isopatch Jack Be Quick the traveler Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 207804

research--you are assuming omicron would have gven them such dire effects--omicron is a common cold!! and even te first covid had over a 98% survival rate w/o a jab-if you ere under 70 w/o BIG co -morbidities so we destroy democracy to avoid a bad case of flu and guarantee reelection of democrats --congratulations