Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (220640)	12/22/2021 3:02:45 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 361364

>> You already pointed out that he didn't enter the Capitol. To be clear, the trespassing charges do not require entering the Capitol. You would think, but no, not at all. Probably most of those charged with trespassing/parading never entered the Capitol. >> They might have talked to him without telling you about it. Yeah, they certainly did, when they set this whole thing up. But talking to him does not alleviate the need for him to face justice.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (220640)	12/22/2021 3:03:38 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361364

>> You already pointed out that he didn't enter the Capitol. To be clear, the trespassing charges do not require entering the Capitol. You would think, but no, not at all. Probably most of those charged with trespassing/parading never entered the Capitol. >> They might have talked to him without telling you about it. Yeah, they certainly did, when they set this whole thing up. But talking to him does not alleviate the need for him to face justice. You call it the "far right", I call it the "knowledgeable" right. These are different. We are simply asking questions that need to be asked and we aren't getting any answers.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (220640)	1/2/2022 4:03:31 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361364

>> They might have talked to him without telling you about it. Talking to him in no way absolves him of responsibility for being the organizing individual in the storming of the Capitol. There plenty of hard-core proof that he is guilty of having incited that event. So, how could "talking to him" have gotten him off the hook? That really has to be explained if the committee is to have any gravitas at all. So, you explain that instead of posting bullshit. This is YOUR claim, and no one else's. How is this man walking away scot-free while others without leadership roles are rotting in prison?