SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clarksterh who wrote (8090)2/6/1998 6:29:00 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
FOOL PLATE SPECIAL-Qualcomm Falls Flat
An Investment Opinion by Alex Schay

Qualcomm Falls Flat

Wireless phone service provider, equipment maker, and related infrastructure supplier Qualcomm Inc. (Nasdaq:QCOM - news) shocked investors last night after announcing that it expects to report flat Q2 EPS in comparison to its prior year period. A year ago Qualcomm earned $0.23 per share, which stands in stark contrast with current Q2 estimates for $0.50 per share. Investors in Qualcomm are reeling largely as a result of the company's about-face with respect to its forecast for South Korean demand. Just a little over two weeks ago, Qualcomm reported that demand for its ASIC products in Korea "continues to be positive," and that it expected to sell more equipment to the country (offsetting declines in the nation's currency). Last night Qualcomm provided an "Update" on the Korean market, reporting that two Korean manufacturers had requested a partial cancellation of Q2 orders, and that a previously announced order for 1800 Mhz Q-Phones "will not be fulfilled." The company further reported that overall sales for its various Q-phones are expected to be lower than anticipated in the second quarter and that it will lay off 700 members of its "temporary" manufacturing workforce.

An analyst at BT Alex. Brown summed up the majority opinion in the analyst community on the matter this morning, "Last month, they said Korea's manageable and now they say they have a problem. They've ruined their credibility." This response seems a natural one, but begs the question, whose credibility has been ruined? The company that makes a forecast, or the investment community that embraces the optimistic assessments without scrutiny. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. The fundamental issue that this raises is the time and resource constraints (as well as institutionalized perceptions) that prevent independent verification of information. The simple fact is that investors (analysts included) are inundated with information and the urge to quickly classify data is intense. The dissonance in our brains is ameliorated when we, ahhhhh, file those "conclusions" away, because lingering uncertainty hurts. As more people pile on and agree with these conclusions (the accepted view), it becomes harder and harder for individuals to go against the grain.

We could condemn this behavior strongly, but that would be silly because we all are susceptible to it. However, acknowledging these inclinations iterated in numerous ways, "the herd instinct" or "jumping on the bandwagon," helps in attempting to understand our investing behavior. The soul searching prompted by the Oxford Health (Nasdaq:OXHP - news) affair highlights precisely this issue. The toe-the-line groupthink of some analysts (where only a lone dissenting voice had issued a "sell" rating on the firm) led the popular press to decry the cozy relationships between companies and the analysts that follow them, as well as the need to maintain a critical view. However, it is also this situation that creates inefficiencies -- when what is broadly accepted turns out to be false and where a select few that do a sufficient amount of legwork can profit. Independent verification, individual investors, and Phil Fisher's "What 'Scuttlebutt' Can Do" come to the fore.

For example, Anne Anderson, president of Atlantis Research, didn't accept what Oxford Health was telling the analyst community. She painstakingly pored over New York State Insurance Department Records, and with calculator in hand she found that Oxford's membership roles were climbing, but the number of hospital days per patient was declining. The disparity led to suspicion, and a short position in the equity. The obvious shortcoming of this example is that the work is painful, time consuming, and often not fruitful. And in the case of Qualcomm, phone calls to South Korea are expensive.

Caxton



To: Clarksterh who wrote (8090)2/6/1998 7:10:00 PM
From: moose  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Clark, I know when you short you must hit the ask. I thought that would be counted as positive volume and push the stock up. I don't see any reason why the shorts would cover now.