To: Ross Roberts who wrote (5034 ) 2/7/1998 12:44:00 AM From: K. M. Strickler Respond to of 74651
I know you didn't ask me, but here is what I think! MSFT has such a large embedded base ( I call it 'critical mass' ), that regardless what they produce ( and I am not 'evaluating' their software ) there are automatically enough sales to generate the kind of cash 'cow' to keep development in process. Sometimes it seems that the upgrades don't do much, but since I personally don't disassemble the code to see what the improvements are, I have to take them at face value. Since it takes a lot of time, hence a lot of money to develop something like NT before NT starts paying for itself, that cash has to come from somewhere. I believe that 'most' of the users of MSFT products get a pretty good 'bang for the buck' in that most users that I know don't approach the capability of the current software they have. When the user comes up with a 'new' (to them) idea, many times the function is already available, and the user just has to learn how to use it! As an investment, I feel that BG has been very fortunate in predicting where the industry is going, or dragging toward his vision. He may be in error, and people will complain that it isn't going the way that 'they' wanted it to go, but BG is in the drivers seat, for now. If something were to happen to BG, I'm not sure that the vision of the next in command would be as good. The have a lot of talented people, but the 'captain' still drives the ship! I have MSFT as a 'BUY' for the long term! ( I think there will be a Stock Market 'glitch' when the Y2K problem hits, and I'm not sure I would hold any investments across that period. ) Does this help? Thoughts! Ken