Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (221796)	1/5/2022 12:29:35 PM
From: Sam	1 Recommendation Recommended By CentralParkRanger Respond to of 354608

Jim Hoft makes stuff up as much as you do. And the headline doesn't even say that anything is proven or that there is an "admission". There are allegations. There have been many allegations made over the past year. Virtually none of them have been proven. In fact, virtually all of them have been disproven. And most, perhaps all, of the ones that have been shown to be true have shown that the culprits were Trump voters.

To: i-node who wrote (221796)	1/5/2022 1:06:30 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 354608

Looks like an admission to me. This is the same thing we've been talking about. It's the same thing as the investigation what was requested in Wisconsin. I carefully read the materials you presented and told you I thought there was cause for the requested investigation and asked if you knew if there had been one. You dismissed my effort with "you've deteriorated, sadly." Here I had the same reaction as Brumar. Almost posted to you my frequent-flyer admonition about skis. In this case the SoS determined that there was cause for an investigation. So I whip out one of my frequent-flyer words--differentiate. You don't differentiate between enough substance for an investigation and a determination of fault. No, it wasn't an admission. It was merely a recognition of cause for an investigation. You jump to conclusions--those Dirty D's have definitely done it. Reasonable people wait for the results of an investigation. BTW: The group does not allege the ballots delivered by couriers were fraudulent. Nonetheless, lawful ballots delivered by third-parties to drop boxes would run afoul of Georgia's law. tennesseestar.com