Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (182463)	1/9/2022 6:53:13 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217786

TJ - simple question - why all this article matters from an economic point? Reminds me of your statement that Xi Jinping, walked 10KM to be able to read Faust by Goethe - does it mater if true or false?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (182463)	1/9/2022 8:10:00 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217786

Good article from Bloomberg. Is it relevant ? Considering the Monarchy is very much in focus in the British Publics eye. Google News - Search Now Good looking Harry is very much the center of attention (although in background) as was his good looking mother Diana. She was very popular indeed, until it all went wrong. Still some factual hiccups on that score. And now we have Charles. He seems to have taken a leading role in British Politics like telling everyone "as it is" on Covid and the Great Reset. A strange and unusual step for British Royalty to get involved. There have been issues like that in the past. Magna Carta, Charles the First, etc. But of course these seem to be truly historic times. The past is no guarantee of future events. There were some hiccups in the early (Spring 2020) Covid Statistics. A lot of Celebrities got Covid early on: Boris Johnson, Prince Charles, Sharon Osbourne, Hugh Grant, Prince William, Khloe Kardashian, Mel Gibson, George Stephanopoulos, Chris Cuomo, Tom Hanks, Rand Paul, Harvey Weinstein, plus many others. For a while back in 2020, I was thinking the virus only targeted the rich and famous. They all survived though. Then I remembered reading Craig Murries blog. "Flu epidemics have much better punctuality than the trains" Momento Mori - Unpopular Thoughts on Corona Virus - Craig Murray and "Let me make this important statement. I write as somebody whose heart and lungs are damaged and in poor condition, following the multiple bilateral pulmonary emboli which nearly killed me in 2004, which mysteriously appeared at precisely the time the UK and US governments were desperately trying to get rid of me as Ambassador, just a couple of weeks after I had been finally cleared of all the false charges with which the British government had attempted to fit me up." So much for bad luck. But my theory on Celebrities being susceptible to Covid was obviously wrong. The virus now seems to preferentially infect right wing radio hosts, aspiring right wing politicians and officials. The outcome seems to be death in each case. The doctors must be baffled by it all. I know I am. bwdik. ref: 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board - Msg: 33652773 (siliconinvestor.com) That Bloomberg graph shown earlier is a doozy. It goes all the way up to 2.5% ! A must keep post !! Would be interested if a really smart modeller like Neal Fergusson did a mathematical model in a possible future where the inflation rate returned to historic norms... like 4% to 10% percent (not over doing it at all ) and seeing what the prediction would be for BTC. It may be possible to pick BTC again for a few cents each? Count me in if I have any pennies left by then. I may even chip in a quarter ounce silver coin and pick up some cheap BTC for old times sake. The cyber version of some third world countries vastly inflated currency :-)