Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (222261)	1/9/2022 12:14:49 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 355562

Another one of your lies; Zuckerberg didn't hire anybody.

To: i-node who wrote (222261)	1/9/2022 1:33:14 PM
From: Lane3	2 Recommendations Recommended By CentralParkRanger combjelly Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 355562

It is absurd that you are just fine with people, hired by Zuckerberg, “helping” voters fill out ballots, while you are concerned the same voters will be coerced when they they are helped with connecting on their cell phones from the privacy of their homes to vote electronically. That is out hilarious. What is hilarious, or would be were it not so sad, is that you interpreted my pointing out your logical shortfall as an expression of concern about the underlying substance. You should be concerned that you are proposing something that runs counter to your stated objectives. You have proposed something with the same vulnerability as your strenuous complaint about the current system and apparently can't see it, even after I pointed it out to you. Granny in the nursing home is equally vulnerable to her nurse's influence whether her ballot is on paper or on her phone. You haven't fixed with your proposal that problem, which troubles you so much that you want to get rid of absentee ballots. Well, if it's a fatal flaw in one, then it's a fatal flaw in the other.