SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (222382)1/10/2022 8:25:46 PM
From: Sam3 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
Terry Maloney
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356853
 
Remember how excited you were about the Mueller report, as CNN and WaPo would announce its lie of the day? All lies. There was no truth to any of it. No truth to any accusation of a major issue with trump. All lies. You, Wharfrat, Chris, Lane and the others, all sucked in by it. You never admitted one of the lies. You just ascot as though there was something of truth, and there was not. Not one significant charge landed. Not one significant charge landed [from the Mueller Report].

Somehow you manage to ignore the fact that Mueller himself said he couldn't indict a sitting president due to DoJ rules. But carry on with your absurdities; you do seem to get a kick out of it so I suppose we shouldn't deprive someone of his joy.

Mueller clarifies comments on whether he could indict Trump
The special counsel's report said he never came to a determination about whether the president should be charged because of DOJ rules.

July 24, 2019, 12:58 PM EDT / Updated July 24, 2019, 4:00 PM EDT
By Dareh Gregorian

Former special counsel Robert Mueller testified Wednesday that he did not indict President Donald Trump on obstruction of justice charges because of Department of Justice guidelines barring a sitting president from being indicted — but later clarified his remarks.

The confusion came amid questioning from Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California during Mueller's testimony to the House Judiciary Committee.

Lieu recounted the three elements needed for the crime of obstruction of justice.

"I believe a reasonable person looking at these facts could conclude that all three elements of the crime of obstruction of justice have been met, and I'd like to ask you the reason, again, you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC (the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel) opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?" Lieu asked.

"That is correct," Mueller asked.

continues at nbcnews.com



To: i-node who wrote (222382)1/10/2022 10:04:35 PM
From: combjelly3 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
CentralParkRanger
Terry Maloney

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356853
 
Um, just because a sitting president can't be charged, or even investigated by anyone who isn't Congress, doesn't mean he is innocent. Likewise, when a party decides that even when they know he is guilty that that they won't vote to have him removed, it doesn't make him innocent.