SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Pharmacopeia, Inc. (ACCL) (Prev: PCOP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dillon who wrote (58)2/8/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: Dr. Voodoo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 179
 
Do you know how much in $ MSI figures into the balance sheet? I thought they had significant revenues.



To: dillon who wrote (58)2/9/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Susan Rodney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 179
 
Dillon,

I'd like to elaborate on some of your comments and correct some inaccuracies:

You said

Why sell at 21:

1) Dilution of PCOP stock. 8.5 million share dilution.

This acquisition is expected to be accretive to shareholders, NOT DILUTIVE. Previous estimates of ($0.50) and $0.02 for 1998 and 1999, respectively, are now ($0.01) and $0.45. These projections represent a significant improvement in operating performance.

2) If price stays at 21 the acquisition would cost PCOP shareholders $180 million!

If the stock remains at $21 (although today it closed at $19.69), the purchase price will indeed be somewhere around $180 million. This price of approximately 3X 1997 revenues still compares favorably to the market cap/revenues of a group of comparable companies which is 5.1 times revenues and the prices of a group of recent similar acquisitions which is 4.2 times revenues. So we think we actually will pay a very fair price for MSI.

3) Insiders sold at $15 and $18 (Lewis J. Shuster sold at $18, Chabala John sold at $18 and twice at 15 on date 11/97.

I believe it was actually back in 11/96 that these sales took place, not 1997. Lew sold a small amount for personal reasons and Jack retired and decided to take some profits. Both men still own a considerable amount of stock and/or options.

4) Merger agreement is based on a share price of $16.50.

I'm not sure what your point was here.

5) From the last SEC filing of PCOP: "The Company has incurred losses since inception and, as of September 30, 1997 had an accumulated deficit of $33.3 million.

The Company anticipates incurring additional losses over at least the next SEVERAL YEARS"

Clearly based on my answer is #1 above, this statement will no longer be true once this acquisition is consummated.

6) Consensus estimate for current fiscal year ( 12/98 ) : $ -0.42 per share

Again, based on my answer to #1 above, this clearly will no longer be true.

7) Alex Brown & Co reiterates strong buy because they are one of the underwriters of PCOP. They have a commercial interest in PCOP. Alex brown and the other two PCOP underwiters (Cowen & Co, UBS Securities) did sell at these levels. If they sell I am not going to buy.

The underwriters didn't sell stock. They simply acted as a broker between Pharmacopeia and the investment community. Also, please consider Lehman Brothers, Everen Securities and OrbiMed partners. Each firm has a buy recommendation on Pharmacopeia and has no current "commercial interest" in PCOP.

Hope this helps.

Sue