Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: golfer72 who wrote (755191)	1/16/2022 6:56:40 AM
From: Maple MAGA	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Respond to of 793843

Which Mask is Suitable for Children? January 15, 2022 The European FFP2 mask is similar to the N95 mask, and is one of those commonly seen in public worn by dutiful citizens who are attempting to keep everybody “safe”. The following article highlights the unsuitability of the FFP2 mask for use by children. It’s worth noting that the possibility of not masking children at all is never considered — the discussion is simply about which mask is appropriate for children. Conclusion: the standard blue surgical mask — billions of which now clog the sea beds and coral reefs of the world — makes the best kiddie muzzle. Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from the regional German daily Nordkurier: Completely unsuitable — Stiftung Warentest aborts FFP2 test Stiftung Warentest advises against using FFP2 masks for children. The breathing resistance was clearly too high in all tested models. Berlin —They are colorfully packaged and adapted to the size of the small heads. Still, FFP2 masks are not a good choice for youngsters. This is the conclusion reached by Stiftung Warentest after examining 15 models that indicate suitability for children. Sobering conclusion: none of these masks is suitable for children — the product testers were looking at 6- to 12-year-olds. The reason is that they have too much breathing resistance. Surgical masks are the better choice, especially for continuous use in schools, writes the foundation in the magazine “test” (issue 01/22). Since there are no values specified in a standard for the maximum breathing resistance of the mask for children, the values for adults were used as a reference for the study. The foundation stipulated that the children’s masks should have values that are only about half as high as the maximum values permitted by the standard for adult models, because six to twelve year old children usually have less forceful breathing than healthy adults and their lung volume is about half as large. Many fail to meet even adult limit values However, all tested masks in mini format failed because of the requirement for breathing resistance: none of them even came close to these lower values, and many did not even comply with the adult limit values. The high breathing resistance was already a knockout criterion, according to the Stiftung Warentest. Aspects such as filter effect and fit were therefore no longer checked at all. The problem is also: if children find it difficult to breathe, they may not put the mask on properly, according to Stiftung Warentest. This allows air to flow in and out relatively unhindered. If you want to protect your child particularly well for a short time in a full lane, you should instead use the 3M Aura 9320+ adult mask, advises Stiftung Warentest. It was already the test winner in the test of adult models. Their breathing comfort is OK for children, their filtering effect is high and they also fit small heads. Prefer surgical mask at school However, surgical masks for children are the better choice for permanent wear. Yes, they offer little self-protection. But: they protect others, that is their main purpose. If all the children in the classroom wear these masks, this, in combination with other measures such as regular ventilation, significantly reduces the risk of infection. Afterword from the translator: They give with one hand and yank it away with the other… I still remember that when I was an apprentice we were told — daily — that we could only use a dust mask for 20 minutes MAX if we work in a dusty environment, because of health issues due to the Mask. It was 20 minutes mask on and then a minimum of 30 minutes mask off. Weird how these rules are being thrown out the window when it strengthens state power and makes the coffers ring for the select few.

To: golfer72 who wrote (755191)	1/16/2022 8:51:25 AM
From: skinowski	4 Recommendations Recommended By lightshipsailor MulhollandDrive THE WATSONYOUTH Thomas M. Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793843

They cant vax people under the EUA if effective therapeutics exist. Its as simple as that Two points. 1) I heard this many times, from many people - but never saw the law actually quoted - or linked. So, no opinion. And 2) no one’s asking them to “approve” IVM and other repurposed meds. It is absolutely legal to prescribe them “off label” - and there is certainly plenty of data as for their safety and effectiveness. All we need is to stop sanctioning doctors who do it. Ask bureaucrats to please stop overruling doctors and get TF out of the business of practicing medicine. Not too much to ask, is it.