Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (17514)	2/7/1998 9:08:00 PM
From: Grainne	Respond to of 108807

Yes, you are correct, Freddy. Currie's lawyer would not have been allowed to witness her deposition. However, as soon as the witness leaves the deposition, he or she can be debriefed--by her own attorneys or the president's, or any other party, if she feels like talking. One notable thing about Currie is that she took quite a bit of time off from work a few weeks ago, and the White House was concerned she was cooperating with Starr's investigation at that time. I have heard that she is a very honest woman, and she is in a very tough spot, continuing to work at the White House. It is even conceivable that what she said in her deposition is more damaging to the president than she would have disclosed to them after the deposition, in her debriefing. It might be very difficult for her to continue working there during this investigation. I suspect that telling the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, is not the party line at the Clinton White House!!