Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The new NFL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (66642)	1/18/2022 6:33:04 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 88005

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (66642)	1/18/2022 7:11:23 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 88005

The Mannings last night on the Manningcast kept bringing up how the Rams were playing "cover 0". That's where you remove the safety and play man-man on the receivers. This frees up one player to blitz. Belichick used to be the master at disguising these blitzes, i.e. you knew the blitz was coming but not where it was coming from or even how. Brady will eat this coverage alive with simple dump off passes or even exploiting the man coverage if given time to throw. Not that the Rams will use this defense against the Bucs... my point being you can't assume the same sort of defensive dominance the Rams had last game to this next game. - Jeff