SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (755885)1/24/2022 6:34:56 PM
From: skinowski8 Recommendations

Recommended By
Alan Smithee
alanrs
Hoa Hao
lightshipsailor
Maurice Winn

and 3 more members

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843
 
NATO membership of Ukraine would not be a serious threat to Russia, because NATO isn't as an alliance is defensive. It definitely wouldn't render Russia indefensible.
OK, we just need the NATO generals and the Russian generals to accept your views, and they can all get together and drink vodka.

My main interest in this issue is simple - I don’t want the world to come to an end over this sh*t. And it may, ideal case scenarios notwithstanding.



To: TimF who wrote (755885)1/24/2022 7:29:44 PM
From: sm1th2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Alan Smithee
Joe Btfsplk

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793843
 
Its all basically pure unjustified aggression on Russia's part.
While that is true, why is it our responsibility to resist it?



To: TimF who wrote (755885)1/17/2023 7:02:22 PM
From: Maple MAGA 2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny
TimF

  Respond to of 793843
 
I'll give you credit for calling this one correctly from the start. I initially thought Ukraine should capitulate to save lives.