Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (183119)	1/25/2022 12:40:26 PM
From: Trader77	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217740

Not discussing from the choice perspective just the protocol itself. I believe Kory and the rest of the front line doctors do have good intentions of helping people. That's why they believe it's ethical to recommend wearing effective face masks in higher risk environments (indoors with improper ventilation). The size of the virus particle is less important since it will attach itself to the larger breath and cough droplet particles, which is why I think the front line doctors are recommending the N95 masks to begin with. I guess I'm just interested on how we pick and choose which parts of a protocol we choose to follow and which we ignore. In general I think we are facing a virus that was genetically modified to have an optimal binding with the human receptors making us the perfect host for this thing to thrive on (even if that happened naturally through recombination the result is still the same - humans are optimal hosts), so I'm interested in all of the necessary protocols as I personally don't think there's any single one that works as a stand alone.