Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Harvard Scientific (HVSF)Hot$$- male impotency medicine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce Olsten who wrote (3145)	2/7/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Batman	Respond to of 3906

.............atomic batteries to power.................turbines to speed................. This is Batman. Remain calm, Bruce. Bruce, Does this stuff really bother you? I guess I can answer my own question by the fact that you took the time to put your post together. Yes, Jack Garnes is a complete ass (most likely a front for Waite: I have seen on Jack's posts on various threads claiming to own 50,000 to several million HVSF shares (he can't keep the number straight). Obviously if he owns several million shares, the only way to acquire such a holding would be to be given shares for free as Waite and See have). But I like reading Jack's posts. He's a ninny. But this is a thread on a ghost company. What are we going to talk about? The company? It consists of only two people. The company's fundamentals? It has no fundamentals. The product? What product? Phase II trials? I don't want to hear anybody mention Phase II trials on this thread again--it only lends legitimacy to the notion that the company is contemplating Phase II trials by even mentioning the term. What are we going to talk about, Bruce? Come on, tell me. Tell me, Bruce. There's nothing here. Nothing but Jack Garne to entertain us. Besides, if you get rid of Jack Garne, Waite and See will simply pop up under a new name. We've had Gene Martineau, then Don Roberson, now Jack Garnes. Go back and read Don Roberson's posts. Christ. A bunch of drivel about painting his house, putting up Christmas lights, cooking various dinners. Mostly about painting his house. (Waite and See and their ilk put up these posts as a way of "managing" the thread, i.e. they place large numbers of posts in order to put as much distance between the current contemporary post and some particularly damaging post. This is done in the knowledge that most people don't go back and read posts more than several hundred old). And there's more: we've had to put up with some nitwit woman (I forget her posting name) who chattered back and forth with Roberson about breaking out her dress to go dancing, putting on her red shoes, etc, who went silly with happiness at her new great "wealth" as a result of a 20 cent climb in the company's stock price. Bruce, which would you rather be subjected to: Roberson's drivel, or Garne's drivel? I'd vote for Garne's drivel any day. Go back and re-read the posts on this thread from about April of last year. Then decide if you want to get rid of Garne. I am new to this thread and just spent the last 48 hours reading the posts from day one, and I don't think that I want to go through that experience again. Such drivel. Getting wealthy because HVSF rallied from a buck to a buck twenty??? After it has crashed from nine dollars fifty??? You must be out of your mind. I would be more interested in any thoughts on a way of getting rid of that other Waite and See poser: "Afaq Sarwar". He claims he's perfectly content to having lost all of his money on this stock (Roberson also claims he doens't mind). I bet Waite and See just love his posts. Gosh, if everybody thought the way "Afaq Sarwar" thinks, Waite and See would be in con man heaven. "Afaq Sarwar" performs a thread management function for Waite and See that I call the "anesthesizer". He's unbothered in the face of complete financial disaster; he's an easy-going guy, and you should be too. Why get upset just because you saw your money go down the drain in a New York minute with no explanation from the company as to what's going on. Anybody on the thread have any thoughts on how we can get rid of "Afaq Sarwar's" drivel posts? Bruce, getting rid of Jack Garne is not a major issue for this thread. In fact, he's part of the broader canvas of what is going on. Step back from the trees a second, and take a look at the forest. Garne is part of the broader thread management here. Getting rid of him isn't going to solve the problem. In fact, Waite and See probably WANT you to get upset over Garne. That way, you take your mind off the scam that is happening in front of you, and you end up concentrating your mind on Garne's antics--just what they want--when you should be looking at the entire scam. Step back and take a look at what is happening here. Garne isn't the problem. The scam is the problem, and their thread management tactics are just a function of that. Batman P.S.--In any event, Bruce, at least wait until my post later today before taking any action. I think it will concentrate even Jack Garne's mind.