Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: didjuneau who wrote (756178)	1/29/2022 1:26:26 AM
From: garrettjax	5 Recommendations Recommended By alanrs i-node locogringo Thehammer Tom Clarke Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794307

I read so much about 'Durham isn't going to do anything', 'Durham is moving so slow that he'll never indict anyone before statutes of limitations run out...' and so on. Couldn't disagree more. Durham is conducting an investigation the way it should be. Investigate, check, double-check, triple check. Follow all the leads no matter where they lead. No leaks. Indict when you have evidence to do so and the indictment doesn't interfere with other parts of the investigation or better yet indict when said indictment strengthens or builds cases elsewhere. Looking at his history I have faith in him. If there are no indictments it will be because no one broke the law. I doubt that's the case. Doing a good job is one thing but there also is the fact that longer it takes the closer we get to Republican control of Congress and another Republican President. This would make it much less likely that the affair gets swept under a rug somewhere. After what happened in Benghazi, I want Hillary in chains! Sooner or later, no matter -- as long as it sticks!