Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : And The 7th Angel Sounded -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (346)	2/7/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: Jamey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 609

"A man who is convinced against his will is of the same opinion still." Bob, sorry but I am not in a mood to argue the end times. I just want to prioritize God's grace for today. Take care, James

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (346)	3/1/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: MSB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 609

Hello Bob, I was just knocking around today looking for something which bordered on interesting (or contraversel) to read, and I happened upon your discussion with Mr Garret. I can't figure out what any of the versus you quoted has to do with abortion. This subject has all of a sudden hit me square in the face. And while I have my own opinions about abortion, it is amazing how those opinions can be augmented to fit any given situation. But whether abortion should or shouldn't be legal aside from the morality issue, I'm wondering what your proposals are if abortion is illegal, the mother must bring the child to full term, and who will raise that child if the procreators of said child have no wish to do so? Your thoughts, please.