SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (756257)1/30/2022 2:41:08 PM
From: Maple MAGA 5 Recommendations

Recommended By
alanrs
frankw1900
kckip
lindalou
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 793846
 
Rex Murphy: Should Justin Trudeau be deciding what views are 'acceptable'?

The prime minister's scornful dismissal of the truckers convoy makes me wonder: have those who rule us forgotten the basis of their rule?

Rex Murphy

Jan 28, 2022



Supporters line the road waving flags and signs to cheer on a convoy of truck drivers in Rigaud, Que., on Jan. 28, 2022. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has dismissed participants in the "Freedom Convoy" to Ottawa as a "fringe minority" holding "unacceptable" views. PHOTO BY CHRISTINNE MUSCHI/BLOOMBERG

A couple of years ago Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was sending valentines to our noble truckers for keeping Canadians fed through their deliveries. Yet a couple of days before this weekend’s gathering of the aforementioned truckers, who have travelled half of Canada in midwinter, from both directions, to express their concerns and feelings in a peaceful protest, he shoved them to the margins, declaring them a “fringe” and their views “unacceptable.”

Trudeau, in perhaps his meanest public statement to date, scorned them. He dismissed and derogated their motives. He gave the dismissal in his best “I’m-a-real-leader,” determined voice. His “I-really-mean-it-this-time” voice.

He described them as “a small fringe minority.” A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian, someone once said. But this “small fringe minority” can’t be Canadians. They have “unacceptable views.”

“Unacceptable views?” Are we in China now?

Trudeau isn’t Plato. He may even be a few steps down from that high intellect. But even if he were, I’d hold off on the prime minister of a democracy ruling on what is or is not acceptable.

'Unacceptable views?' Are we in China now?

That statement of his made me genuinely wonder: have those who rule us forgotten the basis of their rule? The leaders of a democracy do not have “excommunicatory” competence. They do not get to declare what is a “fringe minority.” Nor do they have their vassals — I think of Trudeau’s former adviser and close personal friend Gerry Butts — sprinkling Twitter with slurs regarding the integrity and purpose of a large-scale, grassroots reaction to this government’s extended and flawed response to the COVID pandemic, pumping vitriol on its behalf.

So, directly, I ask — who is Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister, to declaim on what is “acceptable” thinking? Does a prime minister of a democracy rule on what are “acceptable” responses to his very own government’s policies and practices?

This is a 33-per-cent-minority prime minister. So let me ask again what I have asked in other columns.

Has Trudeau had the courtesy to go and meet with a few truckers? Not just their leaders, if indeed they have formal leaders. Has he listened to any of the actual individuals who have thought it worthwhile to make this arduous journey? No cameras. No photo op. Just sit in a cab, or grab a coffee in a diner, and hear a few individual drivers out. It would be intensely enlightening.

There is a voice within this protest, a voice beyond the owner of the hands on the wheel, beyond the cheers coming from the side of the road or from the highway overpasses. A voice coming from the less comfortable in society, the perennially less seen or regarded. It’s the voice of dutiful, working citizens whom the past two years of shutdowns, loss of work or severe reduction of income, all kinds of pressures and anxieties, have worn them down. The truckers are emblems, stand-ins for these Canadians.

And because they usually make no noise, usually just go about their business, hardly ever stage even a small demonstration — until now — to the professional classes, these Canadians are just simply not there. That’s the real gap here. The political and commentating clerisy really don’t know, and have made no effort to know or appreciate, the lives and livelihoods of those on the lower end of the economic scale. How the other, less fortunate, half lives.

No one who has ever dealt with such wonderful people would dare to slander the great majority of them as “fringe” or “unacceptable.”

Salt of the earth, is by far the apt description.

The truckers are emblems, stand-ins for these Canadians

Our country, or our sense of country, is the accumulation of the temperaments of its citizens.

And the average, normal, typical — whatever the appropriate adjective is — Canadian individual is a very welcoming person. When in difficulty he or she simply wants a chance to speak, and a polite ear to listen.

Not to be brusquely hectored by their leader, in effect shunned before given the chance to speak.

This was a low moment in Canadian politics. A deliberately political and, let us be honest, very mean-spirited and calculated characterization of what I am sure is, by far in the main, a movement of honest Canadians caught in a hard time asking their government, and their PM in particular, to give them a just and respectful listen.

I’m writing the day before their full arrival in Ottawa. Let’s see who’s there to listen and who’s willing to give a fair hearing.

Press on truckers. I hope the long and hard ride was worth it.

National Post

The big issues are far from settled. Sign up for the NP Comment newsletter, NP Platformed.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (756257)1/30/2022 5:07:18 PM
From: tntpal4 Recommendations

Recommended By
DinoNavarre
sm1th
Thomas M.
Winfastorlose

  Respond to of 793846
 
Biden announces he will replace Tom Brady with a black woman.




To: Thomas M. who wrote (756257)1/31/2022 8:30:39 AM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 793846
 
Saskatchewan Premier says province will end proof of vaccine policy in 'not-too-distant future'

Second time Scott Moe mentions the potential cancellation of policy within a week

Theresa Kliem · CBC News · January 29, 2022 12:16 PM CT



On Saturday Scott Moe published a written statement on Twitter, supporting the call to end the federal vaccine mandate affecting cross-border truckers. (The Canadian Press)

According to Saskatchewan's premier, the province will end the current proof of negative test and proof of vaccination policy "in the not-too-distant future."

Scott Moe made this announcement in a message on Twitter in connection with rallies being held across the country against a federal policy that requires truck drivers entering Canada from the United States to be fully vaccinated.

This is the second time within a week that the premier of Saskatchewan has made a public comment about the potential removal of the provincial proof of vaccination policy in the near future.

Earlier this week, Moe told a CJME/CKOM radio host that he thought requiring proof of vaccination had "for the most part run its course."

"It increased our vaccination rates tremendously, but I think we're getting to a point now where those that are not vaccinated likely aren't going to get vaccinated," he said in a chat Wednesday with radio host John Gormley.

According to the premier, the province needs to "have a discussion" about proof of vaccination requirements "sometime this month."

In response to Moe's comments on Wednesday, Saskatchewan epidemiologist Nazeem Muhajarine said on Thursday he was surprised by this message.

"This is really not the time to be talking about lifting proof of vaccination policy," said the professor of community health and epidemiology from the University of Saskatchewan.

Physicians decry relaxed restrictions after Health Authority presentation says teams are 'drowning'

Changes to proof of vaccination policy should be guided by data: Sask. experts

Other COVID-19 restrictions and policies have already been dropped recently.

On Thursday, the Saskatchewan government announced its self-isolation policy was changing for people who test positive to five days regardless of vaccination status. The province has also removed the requirement for residents to self-isolate if they are a close contact.

Saskatchewan's public health orders, including mandatory masking, proof of vaccination and mandates for government workers, are set to expire on Feb. 28.

In Moe's statement on Saturday, the premier voiced his support for the rallies' call to end the federal mandates for unvaccinated truckers.

"Vaccination is not reducing transmission," said Moe.

"An unvaccinated trucker does not pose any greater risk of transmission than a vaccinated trucker."

ANALYSIS


'Living with COVID' plan shifts Sask. pandemic response as hospitalizations rise


While Moe said vaccination does not keep people from contracting COVID-19, immunization "does prevent most people from becoming seriously ill."

Sask. opposition leader says Moe spreads "misinformation"NDP Leader Ryan Meili said he was most struck about the Premier's statement regarding the impact of vaccines on transmission or infection.

"That's simply not the case," said Meili in an interview with CBC.

"Even though vaccines are less effective with Omicron, if you are someone who had a vaccine, you are still far less likely to be infected or to transmit to someone else if you are infected."

Meili said everyone wants public restrictions to go away, but right now it is not safe to remove COVID-19 measures.

"We all want to move beyond this as a necessity," said the Saskatchewan opposition leader.

"But he's willing to do it while it will endanger Saskatchewan people's lives, and he's doing that for purely political reasons."

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices| About CBC News
Report Typo or Error| Corrections and Clarifications