Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (183339)	1/31/2022 5:27:07 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218800

Re <<not a lot of difference>> your answer to my question "Is there a difference between Palestine / Gaza / Israel vs Tibet China / Xinjiang China / Taiwan China and N.America / AustraNewZealand, etc etc?" ... clarifies greatly your premise, that I do not have to be concerned that you might be one of 'those' double-standard' folks. I can accept you stance as a legitimate stance, as I said and you noted, applied to all. In the meantime, interesting, that the below video at the 1:2 min mark talks about a Israeli person visiting Xinjiang, and what NYT tried on nytimes.com How Beijing Influences the Influencers Dec. 13, 2021

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (183339)	1/31/2022 6:21:26 AM
From: alanrs	1 Recommendation Recommended By Follies Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218800

Posts like yours often elicit a response along the lines of "go ahead, you first" if that is what you truly believe, so I thought I'd oblige. It's a tough job but somebody has to do it. Man is a scourge, extinction is the solution, what's stopping you?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (183339)	1/31/2022 10:49:33 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Recommended By THE ANT Respond to of 218800

Happy to help: first question to ask is what you and other humans contribute to life on earth in a positive constructive way for the benefit of other living creatures? Next level consciousness, intelligence in our powerful brains, natural world remodeling such as CO2 control, incoming asteroid deflection, genetic engineering, space exploration, understanding everything,, launching suprasomatic intelligence aka artificial intelligence. We're now able to protect the planet, recycle fossil carbon from oil, gas, coal, peat, tars and limestone back into CO2, kill parasites and diseases and anything else we want to do. 2. Why you think humans are more worthy than an elephant a gazelle or any other creature on earth that roam the land. Dumb elephants, gazelles and all other animals just blunder around doing not much, but they have evolved some useful abilities such as smell detection. Humans are in the process of creating a paradigm shift in life on Gaia. Only 100,000 years ago, humans were doing nothing much more than animals. But in the last 10,000 years the selection and evolutionary process has given us lift off from the animal world. 3. Many animals are marking their territory to provide hunting ranges and food to exist only human decide arbitrary their space with guarded borders the bigger the better in their view. Yes, we rule the world and can feed from anywhere on Earth, and soon off it. Unbounded existence is great. It's only 100s of years or maybe a thousand or two since humans were unable to freely roam and were more like chimps in their territorial genocidal tribal ranges. Now we have global integrated systems with 7 billion people acting in mutual development. 4. the best solution for life on earth would be if human kind will disappear be non-existent it will be a blessing the the other remaining thousand of species. No. For a start, sheep numbers would drop and they'd have to start worrying about predators eating their young. People are awesome. None of the other thousand species will deflect asteroids, or mine oil or limestone, and keep CO2 up high enough, or do genetiic engineering [other than their normal mating and fighting and survival processes]. 5 Yes you read it right mass extinction of humanity will be good for all living creatures that share with us the earth Hmmmm, now you are tempting me. Maybe we should create a big list of undesirables. Are you volunteering? As a side comment take a broad view of evolution life on earth started well before Homo Erectus appeared and there was a reasonable balance on life on earth for billions of years. Homo Erectus is a unfortunate divergence in natural history and life development mass extinction of humanity will be a blessing to the remaining species on earth, Homos with erections have never been a problem for me. In fact, like Alan Turing, Freddie Mercury, my boss in BP Oil International [in London], my best man, and untold others, they have been unchained and done wondrous things which wives often inhibit due to the need to feed and look after children. Ignorant evolutionists normally assert that homosexuality is unnatural, but when you think of a family gene pool rather than the individual, a vastly successful non-breeder can give huge benefits to his siblings, cousins, nieces and nephews [niblings], and their descendants. In fact the homosexual men can go full scale deflection to great glory to benefit their whole society. Homo erectus have been great for humanity and not too bad for animals and now of benefit to animals. There is not much hunting to extinction these days and natural habitats are increasingly protected. Mqurice