Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (224736)	2/2/2022 3:12:42 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356053

>> Putting aside the whole abortion thing, you are free to make decisions, and you are also free to accept the consequences. Don't put aside abortion. There is nothing to hide from here. The basic argument is whether a fetus has "rights" that should not be violated willy-nilly, not whether it is a woman's "right to choose" for the fetus. That is the issue. One side places those rights in the care of the mother, the other places them in a kind of sacred trust. I don't know which is correct, but intuitively reducing the number of abortions in the US is a good thing. So, I support that view. >> "Yes, he was free to quit. Is that freedom? " It is coercion and I think it may sometimes be legal but it is almost always wrong. That is, at odds with concepts of freedom.