Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: johnlea who wrote (27958)	2/7/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Respond to of 53903

Good Morning To Newcomers to me Thread...As the MU continues to move up (with many down profittaking and Manip days) I expect to see a plethora of new faces. This is one of the most educational threads on the net...Come talk to your own in house GRIM REAPER...I am here fer you all.. In time if you last ....you will meet Larry and his pal HAL Patrick the Hatrick and pal I forget MBurke and his Red Army DJ and his connections to the whole F%^^%^ world with all the MU related news Kerry and Prometheus with de bottle of Tequila SB and David (the first arranged marriage on SI) Jerry D our star trader in the Commodity pits BPP the MU dreamer hahahah Tom B our raving TK Critic William MIKE W our red light district analyser and many many others oh and PeteM our washboy,waterboy,shoe shine boy...hahahaha

To: johnlea who wrote (27958)	2/7/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

johnlea Meet our "Joker" The unknown ??? Bateman (g) Bateman is the unknown one on this BB Larry Dudash

To: johnlea who wrote (27958)	2/8/1998 1:37:00 PM
From: Thomas G. Busillo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

John, that is an interesting discrepancy. Again, maybe I've been following the Lewinsky scandal a little too much, but... The writer uses the language "it expects" in referring to the (.20-30)/sh loss for the upcoming quarter, as opposed to "analysts expect". I think you ask a valid question, even more so when 1) you line it up against the piece reporting that Dan Niles' would expect lower guidance, and 2) the fact that right after the early-August peak, there seemed to be a slew of revisions/downgrades coming VERY close together. If that NYT report is wrong or the wording of that particular phrase makes it misleading, MU should come out publicly and say so. Good trading, Tom