To: Lane3 who wrote (224778 ) 2/3/2022 10:04:22 AM From: i-node Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 356113 >> I never said or suggested otherwise. Quit reading into what I say. Fair enough. Then leave less to speculation and be specific with your meaning. "We had that discussion before. You support taking rights away from business owners, long held and long supported by Republicans, to coddle the individual who would damage the business. You wouldn't put up with that if hoodlums were outside with spray paint let alone torches." You leave me with no real idea what you're referring to. Obviously, I'm more pro-business owner than any Democrat on this thread. Having been one since I was in my early 20s. All I can see here is that you are somehow jumping to the conclusions of the leftists, which that open businesses convey Covid, which was and still is a lie spread by the leftists themselves. If you look around, the states that have done well are those who minimized the damage done by the lockdown nitwits. So, given that context, it is impossible for me to even speculate on WTF you're talking about. >> Critical? You listed a bunch of annoyances, irritants, not critical principles. In your rant and otherwise, you're coddling a bunch of immature, frivolous anarchists lashing out at the universe. I suspect your idea of "annoyances and irritants" is quite different from mine. What you call an annoyance may well constitute critical issues from my POV, as someone who always had to deal with the minutiae rather than simply ignore it until someone else dealt with it. But once again, your overly sterile writing leaves a lot to the imagination. Not that sterility in writing is bad; I do it, to, when writing user guides and operation manuals.