Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (224896)	2/4/2022 10:17:46 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356169

>> that would reasonably be attributed to a number of bad actors, not the entire Democratic party I'm sorry. It is not an attack on you personally. Let me just ask a question for some clarification, as I think if I understood your position on these items it would put the matter to rest as between you and me. That is, if you gave direct answers to these questions, I would understand your position. Do you think that what Zuckerberg did (which was a small element of the cheating overall) was acceptable as a matter of policy? Do you think would be properly considered as cheating? Do you find it to be corrupt for a highly partisan individual to contribute private cash to election operations, while carefully directing precisely how that money shall be spent? Do you, personally, want to see that become the modus operandi for every election? (obviously, with each of the two sides paying for the particular operational aspects IT believes is important for its own political purposes? Thanks.