Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (224908)	2/4/2022 11:35:53 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356299

>> No, not cheating. Certainly not illegal. An creative act of good citizenship in trying times, I'd say. Yes, you have said before you think it isn't corrupt for a private individual to seize control of selected voting operations. W.T.F. This is what makes me think Democrats are nuts. But to think this logic is applied to everyday decisions within our government, state, local and federal, is just outrageous. Anyone who has experience with the concept of professionalism and what it means knows this is a ridiculous position for someone to take. Including any self-respecting lawyer. You cannot have a fair election when one party controls the voting operations. Period. >> Perhaps. It would depend on whether the conditions specified were partisan. Well, the conditions were partisan. We know that. Zuckerberg, while blocking posts by Trump and encouraging posts on behalf of Biden, is prima facie partisan. Not to even mention the partisan distribution of funds. Duh. >> Absolutely not. Not the optimum way to conduct an election Obviously, there is a great deal of inconsistency in that position. I think the problem is failed analytical ability on the parts of a lot of Democrats. Sometimes, there is stuff there you just do not want to see.