Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (225067)	2/5/2022 1:06:20 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 354608

Thanks. Interesting. Don't see how it could be otherwise.

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (225067)	2/6/2022 10:26:00 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 354608

While I have your attention on this matter and given your first hand experience... In a socialized health care system, citizens have a right to whatever health care they may need. Does that not imply a duty of care assumed and undertaken by the taxpayers? Is there an inherent understanding of that framework? Is there a moral consideration or a right in there? Or is it merely a practical way of paying for and administrating health care? It seems inconsistent to me that a society would undertake/assume a duty of care wrt provision of health care for its citizens yet not have an individual duty of care for one's immediately fallen neighbor.