Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (10597)	2/7/1998 6:49:00 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 31646

Good point. I posted my speculation on a clubhouse post specifically because it's a random possibility for Tava's long term future. Anyone buying this stock strictly on a takeover possibility would be grossly mismanaging their money. The company's current short and medium term prospects are gaining exposure in the marketplace to the benefit of the stock price. Future merger or takeover possibilities should not be a factor in an investment decision on this stock. P.S. Reference to out resident thread devil's advocate are undeserved until he get off his heinie and trys to post something substantive (low order of probability, IMO. This is a great example of a big hat and no cattle.)

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (10597)	2/7/1998 7:33:00 PM
From: patrick gillis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Does anyone care to take a shot at how much revenue TAVA will have to take in to justify a price of 12$ a share? Thanks Patrick

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (10597)	2/7/1998 8:03:00 PM
From: Captain Jack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

This must be the place to day dream if all CK can come up with is idiots may buy for the wrong reason and beat on Mike,,who is making money by the way. Maybe a TPRO day dream thread should be started or maybe that discussion should go to the research thread..... The last talk was McTava--- is not McDonalds buying now???? Let the stock ride and smile quietly.

To: C.K. Houston who wrote (10597)	2/7/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Mike Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

CK, when you reply to my posts, why do you always have to rely on flooding the thread with URLs or copy-paste articles? I understand that in marketing for which you're a real expert, company subjects their potential customers through heavy doses of TV, radios, newspaper commercial to get the idea "sinking" in people's head. You may find some commercials real "stupid" that you can laugh about it but as you keep listening to those on an hourly or daily basis, pretty soon in your sub-conscience, you will start to believe in it. That's how companies sell their "junk". I find a lot of your copy-paste posts irrelevant to this stock. For instance, you may post some articles describing potential failure in the air traffic control systems after year 2000. But does that have anything to do with TPRO's business? By posting those articles, you're implying that TPRO may get a contract to fix the air traffic control systems which is totally bogus. Do you understand how complex those systems are? Honeywell, a real expert in this aerospace field, is still working on it along with IBM for the last 6 years or so. I give you another example. I am currently investing in Powerwave, a company making power amps for cell phones. The company is in real trouble because more than 80% of its customers are in Korea, a country in financial trouble. PWAV stock dropped from a high of 49 to the low teens today. Now, you all know that cell phone business is really booming. So is it relevant to PWAV if I flood some SI thread with numerous articles about the popularity of cell phones? Cell phones may be booming but PWAV is in trouble nevertheless because they depend on Korea for their business. Similarly, there may be some embedded system problems out there but can you identify for me and convince me which area of expertise is TPRO in?