SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (225251)2/7/2022 3:08:07 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361192
 
They sent the members that were best suited for the task.

No, they didn't. The purpose of the committee is to conduct an inquiry. They had plenty of options of members who can ask hard questions. Had they sent some who weren't potential witnesses if not subjects, interested parties, things would have been different.

Even better--a commission with wise old hands rather than current members.

But no, better to try to stonewall and cover it up. How's that working.?..



To: i-node who wrote (225251)2/8/2022 12:51:03 AM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 361192
 
I've never heard of a suggested committee member being a potential witness or collaborator. That might be a factor in it never happening before.

But you think Trump should have an advocate on the committee. Something I can pretty much guarantee you that has never occurred to anyone else before.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News