To: i-node who wrote (225255 ) 2/7/2022 3:32:13 PM From: Sam Respond to of 364214 You are one of the hardest headed dumbasses I’ve ever seen. lol, talk about projection!Everyone understands that both IVM and HCQ are early interventions. You aren’t even trying. Have you read ANY of the positive outcomes What everyone understands is that you are a crazed critter who has very strange obsessive compulsions to rationalize everything Trump says or does or event hints at. Let's look at a couple of past posts. The first one is about what "everyone understands"--it is your bolding in the original post:From: i-node 6/10/2021 12:37:04 PM Read Replies (3) of 225262 We tried to tell you. Now there are 100,000s of dead Americans as a direct result of Democrats animus against Trump. New reports of findings almost daily. You killed people because of your anti-Trump hatred. Learn from the mistakes you make, and make amends. Was Trump right about hydroxychloroquine all along? New study shows drug touted by former president can increase COVID survival rates by 200%A study on 255 patients was done by St Barnabas Medical Center in New Jersey The resulting report, out May 31, found hydroxychloroquine to be effective The drug, when used in a high dose and with zinc, increased survival rates The authors found it was only helpful in severe cases of COVID-19 Patients given the drug as part of the trial were on ventilators Trump's allies have seized on the report to declare that he was correct As president, Trump touted hydroxychloroquine as a preventative treatment He even took it himself, despite doctors then warning it could be dangerous A growing number of studies are now suggesting the drug could be useful Hydroxychloroquine with zinc could increase COVID-19 survival rates by as much as nearly 200% | Daily Mail Online
Message 33354975 My bolding is in the following quote from your post: This is an example of people claiming that HCQ+zinc worked not on early intervention but that "it was only helpful in severe cases of COVID-19". So much for for what "everyone understands". Your own post says the opposite of what you continually claim. Don't you even read your own posts? Here is the second post, this one replying to a very recent post from you that was claiming benefits for ivermectin: To: i-node who wrote (223514 )1/19/2022 11:40:50 PM From: Sam Read Replies (1) of 225262 Oh, and here is the article referred to in that interview on Hill's research and ivermectin. In Re-Analysis, Ivermectin Benefits Disappeared as Trial Quality Increased — When studies with a moderate or greater risk of bias were removed, survival benefit vanished by Kristina Fiore , Director of Enterprise & Investigative Reporting, MedPage Today October 29, 2021
Message 33668419 Here is the problem: it isn't up to me to find studies that show that these two drugs are beneficial in combatting COVID. I just follow the CDC and other proven groups that study these things. It is up to you and others who claim that they are beneficial to prove your assertions. So far, you haven't done so even though you continually claim that there are dozens or even hundreds of studies that show it.