SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: h_ who wrote (1341594)2/7/2022 8:34:22 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
h_
Winfastorlose

  Respond to of 1571898
 
Department of Defense Accused of Altering Data to Hide Alarming Spike in “Vaccine” Injuries

WASHINGTON — A little over a week ago, The Liberty Loft reported on the shocking data presented by attorney Thomas Renz at Senator Ron Johnson’s (R-Wisconsin) panel discussion titled COVID-19: A Second Opinion.

Among the numbers were a 1,000% rise in neurological issues and 300% increases in cancer cases and miscarriages from the five-year average ever since the COVID-19 jabs have been used in the military.

The numbers came from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) while three whistleblower doctors from the Department of Defense (DOD) provided the info the Renz.

Now, allegations are emerging that the DOD is wiping data from the system to cover up this alarming rise.

Johnson sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in which he gave Senate whistleblower protection to the DOD doctors writing: “Any retaliatory actions taken against these individuals will not be tolerated and will be investigated immediately.”


“Renz also informed me that some DMED data showing registered diagnoses of myocarditis had been removed from the database,” Johnson wrote. “Following the allegation that DMED data had been doctored, I immediately wrote to you on January 24 requesting that you preserve all records referring, relating, or reported to DMED. I have yet to hear whether you have complied with this request.”

Johnson asked for information on the DOD’s knowledge of the rise in medical conditions that are linked to “vaccine” injuries and their actions to investigate the rise, and he asked if myocarditis information has been removed from the DMED database and, if so, why and by whom.

Beyond the myocarditis data, Dr. Robert Malone said the DOD’s “data management is going in and actively deleting cases, manipulating the database.”

The reason such a cover up may be taking place is clear, according to Steve Kirsch.





  • Kirsch wrote that this data is hard to dismiss, but noted that the DOD and mainstream media are trying hard to do that. He wrote that a large amount of military doctors know the shots are causing harm and the DMED data is highly reliable.

    The data was never meant for public consumption and the DOD is in panic mode over the leaks not knowing how to deal with it, Kirsch wrote. And he added there’s a massive cover up by the media, specifically by ignoring the story.

    “There is evidence that mainstream media reporters have been instructed not to cover this story or talk to Tom Renz,” Kirsch wrote. “I verified this myself searching for articles about Renz in The New York Times and CNN. So, you’ll only hear about it from alternative media. Think about it … this is one of the most explosive stories of the year (if not the decade) and the mainstream press isn’t covering it at all? What does that tell you? You don’t have to have a lot of critical thinking skills to figure that one out. It pretty much tells you everything you need to know: there is a massive cover up of adverse events.”

    The Liberty Loft also searched MSNBC and Fox News for both Tom Renz and Thomas Renz, and no results showed up.

    The initial response from the DOD was to use “ fact checkers” to say the “2016-2020 numbers used to determine a five-year average were underreported.”

    Kirsch responded: “What’s interesting is that only the event counts related to adverse events caused by the vaccines (as determined in VAERS) were affected by this ‘corruption.’ That is, huge increases observed prior to the correction were only on symptoms that were vaccine related, not on other symptoms. That makes their ‘corruption’ explanation hard to explain. Very hard to explain.”

    “How could a glitch in the computer only affect symptoms associated with the COVID vaccine? That would be the most amazing glitch in computer history. I would love to hear the explanation for that …. Why did the corruption only affect years 2016 to 2020 and not 2021? Why, when we looked at the data before the corruption were only symptoms related to the vaccines elevated?” Kirsch added.

    In a separate piece related to cancer, Kirsch wrote that he’s hearing more and more anecdotal stories of individuals whose cancer was under control is now out-of-control after receiving a jab.

    Kirsch wrote: “If I had a dollar for every person who has related a story about a friend whose cancer was in remission before the COVID jabs, then became uncontrollable shortly after the jab, I could retire …”

    Meanwhile, the recent VAERS, or Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, data released on Friday showed 23,149 deaths reported after being jabbed. As previously reported, Centers for Disease Control has estimated VAERS undercounts injuries by a factor of 6X and independent estimates have estimated as high as a 41X meaning the range of deaths could be between 138,876 and 948,986.



    To: h_ who wrote (1341594)2/7/2022 8:45:45 PM
    From: kckip  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571898
     
    No intention of butting in on your "discussions" here....I'm "in awe" of your supreme argument capacity, your willingness to take the abuse, but EVEN more-so with your grasp of the reality and data.

    This was posted today and I find it interesting.....clearly the evaluation should have extended to the VAXXed versus the UNVAXXed, but didn't until they got to the end with the adolescent population....but good reading anyway.