Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (225330)	2/8/2022 1:47:26 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361506

Yeah, I said both are useful as early interventions. And? Did I say there is no value for IVM at later times? No. I simply pointed out that they are used before Cytokine Storm begins. IIRC, like HCQ, IVM cannot kill cytokine storm once the "critical mass" of inflammation has been reached. That is still correct AFAIK. One could conceive of a situation where IVM was given as part of a group of drugs to fight inflammation but that is why people with Covid are should be given steroids with IVM and/or HCQ. The bottom line is that these drugs can save lives if given early. Both of them. And there is no reason they can't be given together (and I know several who have had them prescribed in that way). I'm not trying to be part of this argument. I was simply pointing out that I did not say what I did not say. If you have such a hard on to catch me in an incorrect statement feel free.