To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (22636 ) 2/9/2022 12:12:12 PM From: Graystone 2 RecommendationsRecommended By gg cox onepath
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37578 Alberta ended restrictionsor Another new way (not) Alberta went through this already, other provinces did not. We have already lifted all restrictions once, last year. The political will as there, the resolve was acted on, restrictions were lifted. Lifted restrictions in Alberta did not work out because the covid has a majority vote in how we handle it. The science was clear, Alberta returned to lockdowns, the delta variant forced that to happen. Your desire to ignore the science does not reflect the experience we have already had in Canada. Ignoring the science does not work.Countries that are on the very end of the omicron covid wave are lifting restrictions. Canada will be able to lift restrictions as well, not because of political resolve or illegal occupations. It will be science that leads the way, not politics. Poseurs and cloistered anti-vaccine fanatics like Lightbound offer nothing to Canadians. Just another cynical politician who chooses to lie, Canadians endorsed the Liberal response in an election. The mandates are not divisive, that is the Conservative talking point that they are selling, no one is buying. The only ones affected by mandates are those who choose vaccine-fear over vaccines, a fringe group. Australia's No Jab No Pay policy was the result of 2 preventable child deaths from pertussis. Well that and the anti-vaxxers trolling the bereaved parents. Australia acted. Since the policy was enacted almost 150,000 children have received vaccinations. << Public health researchers have had mixed evaluations of No Jab, No Pay and No Jab, No Play. Removing non-medical exemptions from vaccine requirements have been questioned on ethical grounds, the potential for coercive policies to lead to an increase in anti-vaccination sentiment, and the inequity of policy designed on welfare conditionality. A study on the impact of removing conscientious objection from financial payments and childcare enrollments found that the policies led to a significant increase in childhood vaccination above the pre-intervention trend. The effect of the policies were larger in areas with lower socio-economic status, higher rates of government benefits, and higher pre-intervention coverage rates. A study of adolescent catch-up vaccination found that No Jab No Pay resulted in a large rise in catch up vaccination.>>