SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sheila rothstein who wrote (47155)2/8/1998 6:58:00 AM
From: Chucky  Respond to of 58324
 
Sheila, I sympathize with you regarding the drop in price, because I too was holding IOM before earnings along with a handful of May Calls. But, if you thought IOM would be fairly priced as high as 16 at the end of '98, why didn't you sell when it became more than fairly valued a year in advance? I know that may not seem like a fair question, but did you even consider selling when it was pre-split over $30?

You say that at this price IOM is "grossly undervalued" according to your valuation model, which if I'm not mistaken, on the high end would be ~$12.60 after Q4 earnings. If grossly undervalued is presently 15-20% below your fair value, how would you characterize the stock if it was now back @ $16 or approx. 25-30% above your fair value?

"If I were the smartest DR. in the world and I came to the office in jeans with a nose ring and a tattoo on my arm, I'd have a hell of a time convincing my patients to follow my advice."
Come on Dr. Rothstein. I may be weird, but if I needed a procedure for a life threatening ailment and had to choose between some idiot, smooth talking, well-groomed DR., or the "smartest DR. in the world" that you described (I am, however, assuming that by stating he was smart, you were implying that he was good at what he does except for appearance?) you could even add that he smoked stogies and rode a Harley ;)

There are a lot of other companies out there; however, even Rocky can't seem to be able to part with this one. The CEO is part of the package. If he doesn't make money in the future, PR isn't going to help. Just for thought, does anyone have any suggestions for a replacement CEO? Larry Ellison?

I'm glad you are voicing the opinions of yourself and others, but dwelling over how things were said @ the CC doesn't seem becoming of a long term investor. Were people buying stock at levels they expected the company to be at at the end of '98?

Please forgive me,
Chucky

P.S. Any suggestions on how to study for Biochem?



To: sheila rothstein who wrote (47155)2/8/1998 7:46:00 AM
From: Mel Boreham  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 58324
 
Sheila, I have been going over your recent posts and the responses to them and have found them interesting reading to say the least. I think that you (and I) like to call ourselves "long term" investors, but probably have a relatively short time frame when it comes to following this stock... If you really are a long term investor, we both should not be members of SI and should not be so intent on reading the conference calls, and posting on a frequent basis here, but we do... so what does that tell us. We still hope for that big run up where we sell the stock at a peak and make a killing on the market and then take our profits elsewhere to some other company with what we think has a similar potential... buy low and sell high, that's what you are supposed to do... Why didn't you and I sell when IOM was at its peak last fall? Probably, greed had something to do with it, as it always does in the market... Fear and Greed are the fuel for the stock market. And with the thought of having twice the number of shares by just waiting til Dec. rolled around was also a nice thought. Twice the leverage for when IOM would be coming out with "blowout" earnings... almost guaranteed by Dr. Iomega and many others who post here, including the folks who post sales snapshots from resellers and from CompUSA and Computer City. I certainly fell into that category. After all I am almost exclusively invested in just 2 stocks, and most is in IOM at the present time. Yes, I was shocked and dismayed by the fall off in the stock price, but, thankfully, I was not on margin, so did not have to receive one of "those calls" that marketeers always dread. Option players are just gambling, so I can't even include them as "investors" these guys make money and loose it just like the other gamblers do at the crap tables in Vegas. They have no real vested interest in the company, just putting side bets on where the price of the stock will be at some point in time. Not that it that sort of thing is bad or immoral, it isn't, but the folks that do this kind of thing, know what they are doing and should know the RISKS that they are taking. I agree that the overall tenor of this thread is quite short term, but I do enjoy keeping up with what is going on with all types of posters, short, long and options stuff. However, just because Mr. Kim Edwards had a bad day and may not have had the proper "SPIN" on the CC that we would have liked, at least he was not a scam artist that some CEOs are and although he tended to use several negative words to describe that he was disappointed in some aspects of the last quarter, I believe he did come across as someone who is HONEST! That is a quality that is very important. He is not sitting on his laurels either, the ad campaign may have sounded to some as an act of desperation, but if you are KE and someone who is paid to take a few risks to build the company further, then I think is doing just what he should do. Get the public educated about what Zips are and what they can do for you and your family, company, etc.

We bought this stock for one reason, we thought it would enhance our bank account at sometime in the future. If you take look at the CC figure I think you will see some truly fantastic growth figures there. And things are going along quite well for the company. Patience is a virtue to those of us who think we are long term investors. Yes, I should have sold out last fall and taken an handsome profit. Why didn't I, because I thought by holding til the new year and excellent earnings report, I would make even more money... Greedy ain't I? or should I say aren't we?!! I guess we all have to look in the mirror and decide just what kind of an investor that we are? I know I have to do this, and maybe we all should look at just what we are looking for from our investment in IOM?? Best regards, Mel