Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask John Galt... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (3593)	2/7/1998 11:13:00 PM
From: Ignacio Mosqueira	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4006

Christine, remember Furhman. He blatantly lied on the stand. It was not perjury under the law. The thing about it Christine is that it really does not matter how many women he had sex with. You have to show that harrassment was involved in any ONE case. Yes I realize that the law allowed the prosecution to question him about Lewinsky. I do not like the law that made that possible. If there was harrassment in the Jones case well and good. In my book there was harrassment if there was sexual activity under duress or without consent. The law does see it differently but the law should change.