Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.R. who wrote (1850)	2/8/1998 1:37:00 AM
From: Wayne J.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Hello! J.R., In a recent posting you indicated that you heard some people say that the downside on this thing is only a couple of pennies. You also indicated that it was misleading to say all you can lose is 2 cents. You also indicated to keep in mind it is trading a 2 cents for a reason, so there may not be a whole lot of potential to move up. You also made another statement that you indicated that you just wanted to paint a clearer picture of the situation. In my opinion, it could very well be possible that your opinion is correct on all of the above three points! I would like to go on record, that I did indicate in my own opinion that the downside was in the two cent range ( mainly because it was trading just under the two cent level at the time I expressed my opinion on the CVIA Thread!-----In response to your comment that my opinion was misleading---I apolagize if that is the way that you interpreted my opinion, as it was not my intent to mislead any one under any circumstance! Just for the record some of my CVIA Shares are down approximately about 65% in market value, from when I bought them ( so I agree with your point with percentage decline in value, whether a stock is trading at $10.00 per share or .02 cents per share!). In my own opinion I keep reminding myself that until we receive official notification that a merger/acquisiton is completed, it remains ( as far as I know) a shell company! Now that I have thought more about, I was probably starting to come close to over stepping my boundary as the role of the spokesperson! Thank you for drawing this to my attention, you had very valid opinions! I will attempt not to include any thoughts or opinions on valuation of share scenarios in future CVIA Postings ( unless in my opinion if a specific and worthwhile need arises). Paul! In my next communication with Jack Arnold I will ask if he can provide any input/comments on the REG S electronic filing scenario, as well as some of the opinions expressed on this CVIA Thread, that there appears to be little hope of finding a buyer for the Reg S placement! In my own opinion, I am still holding out some hope that a buyer for the Reg S shares will step forward! ( Maybe I am just being to unrealistic by remaining hopeful! Time will tell!) In my opinion I can certainly understand how difficult the patience factor is, given all the various factors that we as CVIA Shareholders have experienced over the past several months! Let's keep our fingers crossed and see what the remainder of February brings to us! Best Regards, Wayne J.

To: J.R. who wrote (1850)	2/8/1998 9:00:00 AM
From: D LEE	Respond to of 6654

you have to remember, and with quite a bit of urgency, that most cases of true damage to our pocket books occur when the price of a stock is going up by fraud! This is when we get excited. In our euphoria we rise to the occasion. our baby is going up up up! We can't believe we're so fortunate! Yet, if we can afford it, in deciding where to put some more money "the facts speak for themselves - This is the only way to go!!!" and we goof by chasing the stock. Two weeks later, after reality hits, crying in our beer, things are more where they should AUGHT to be and we are trying to think of ways to emotionally pull our selves out of a downer. No. I didn't see negativity when Wayne mentions price or anything else, and believe we only have the right to consider re-tuning ourselves (be that right or wrong, and a by-law that he has taken onto himself in every way). We should rejoice: in the fact that we didn't invest in the CVIA of great technological promise some months ago, that as a result a substantial portion of the original speculation is still in tact, that a mere individual (Jack Arnold) had the mind sufficient to carry the shell to a place where it may have purpose, that he truthfully promises practically nothing but salvage as beyond that it will be out of his control, that his expedience was useful in finding cash in the time of weakness and that we know a piper will have to be paid. Beyond that the new questions and answers evolve behind closed doors and our own knowledge or lack of it will only have a meager effect on the present day price at best. (In this conversation, I too will leave the future prospect, that a new business is being formed, blowing in the wind.) It is our own responsibility to steer ourselves through the changes to come, price and otherwise, and make sure we don't overindulge in the first (second third etc., wherein the problem lies) place. If we solve that problem in advance and keep things in our own individual prospectives, I can appreciate a comrades statement about loosing 2 cents "case closed" far better than what vast amounts one stands to loose if they don't hurry up and give up now! The part I appreciate is sharing the voyage with someone who has prepared himself for the best and the worst with opened eyes. At the end of that voyage, he will still be the same person. And one most worthy to take another trip with. (In my book luck is when preparation meets with opportunity and the time involved must be used well by investors in their own prudent ways to take care of that and themselves.) Dave