To: N. Dixon who wrote (500 ) 2/8/1998 3:38:00 AM From: inchingup Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50136
Of course I am aware that Hankuk May be manufacturing the product in the future. Until that time arrives though I have a genuine concern that there is some type of problem with the technology. If licenses are expiring, and others going unused, doesn't that give an indication that SOMETHING is amiss? In my book, this is definitely not a natural course of events with the myriad number of applications available along with the tremendous profits available to the licensees. Especially the first one to market the product. Am I the ONLY person of the 4,000 or more shareholders, who actually has doubts as to the viability of mass applications? I think not. There are an awful lot of degreed people here with vast experience in investing. Have any one of you ever owned shares in a company that could or would not give any type of definitive answer as to a production date for a product with such enormous potential? With all the licensee's and the combined forces and resources of the R and D departments of these corporate behemoths am I the ONLY one who cannot understand why there is not a product? Has everyone been blinded by the light of this technology? Are you willing to just listen to Joe (because he's a nice guy, and responds to everyone's request's) tell you that something might occur in the future after another meeting?...or that yes, we have the ability to test this product with our "weather-o-meter" (or whatever it is), but haven't done so yet, even though the test would only take weeks, not years. TESTS, after issuing licenses for production?...get serious. Am I in the TWI-LIGHT ZONE? Personally I would never (and do not) run a business in this fashion. None of you would sit still for these type of answers from a spouse or child, why are many of you accepting them from REFR? LOL GARY