Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Harvard Scientific (HVSF)Hot$$- male impotency medicine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Batman who wrote (3173)	2/8/1998 6:47:00 AM
From: jack w garnes jr.	Respond to of 3906

Batman, It would seen that you really know what your talking about. You have no complaints from me....Its like " who is this guy" Anyway your doing a good job...JG

To: Batman who wrote (3173)	2/8/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: Afaq Sarwar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3906

Batman, You do not seem to understand one thing. I do not have to explain any thing to you. I only post here my opinion, but do not ask or tell any one to do any thing. I respect others and believe that they are smart enough to make their own decision. You on the other hand seem to think that you need to establish your credibility. As for as I am concerned, you have a long way to go. And you know why. It is your stories. It is your assertions. The most recent example is your characterization of my post. First excerpt from my post 3155: <If all this negative hype does push the price down in coming days, I'll certainly be open to buy as much as I can. The only part of my position that is still in black, is the one bought recently when similar activities had pushed the price down to around 30 cents.> Now, your characterization of my statement: <"Afaq", you claim (at a minimum imply, but I think a third-party observer would say that you "claim") that you and others purchased stock at 30 cents per share recently (during the first week of January). The implication is that shareholders basically have nothing to complain about since the price has doubled since then [let's forget about the fact that most people on this thread got sucked into this android at prices north of $6). But there is a problem "Afaq". You expect us to believe that you bought at almost the exact bottom of the trading range. Wow! Aren't you sure lucky. Well, "Afaq", you ARE NOT LUCKY. No, you have gotten greedy and have sealed your fate. Let me explain/expose you.> Well, with this type of mischaracterization of words and statement, I can understand your concerns for credibility. And, your long post yesterday was really some thing else. You really want me to believe that story? The part about how you, through your systematic research, get to this cell phone guy in London. Seriously, if this is the best negative information you can provide to discredit HVSFD, then may be I should have a little more confidence in this company than that I have had until now. But, that requires that I assume you really did a very through DD, and did not discover any thing other than this information about this Savage guy. Unfortunately I am not yet ready to make that leap of faith. But, honestly, I do enjoy your post. They have a certain flair about them. Beside all the fun stuff, I would appreciate if in your future posts you can shed some light on the situation with the short interest in HVSFD by these offshore investors. Afaq Sarwar